Jump to content

Enervation

Members
  • Posts

    517
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

About Enervation

  • Birthday August 26

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location
    United States
  • Interests
    Working, complaining about working, getting money off work, brag about getting money, complaining.

Gaming Identities

  • Steam ID
    EnervationPXOD

Enervation's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

Single Status Update

See all updates by Enervation

  1. So some guys just told me he justifies his gaming purchases based on the "1 hour for every $1" scale... meaning that for every dollar he uses he expects that much gaming time out of a game. That's a pretty dumb system, I'd say.

    1. Show previous comments  4 more
    2. FMW

      FMW

      I don't purchase based on that statistic, but I keep track of it loosely. So far my best value per hour of entertainment is Final Fantasy X. I'm down under 1 cent per hour of fun :)

    3. Enervation

      Enervation

      I understand if people want to get the most bang for their buck, but using that as their *only* indicator for purchasing a game is something that baffles me. I'm certain that most if not all of us buy games for enjoyment, not to nitpick-calculate the hours you spend vs. the money you spend.

       

      Anyways, he shut up after I told him TF2 was free-to-play. He's an avid TF2 player, but apparently he didn't know TF2 went F2P... suspicious.

    4. RockyRan

      RockyRan

      Yeah, I never use it as my only indicator of purchasing, but in certain situations it does come up. I wouldn't buy a $60 game that's ~8 hours long, and if a game keeps me entertained for at least as much as I paid for it I'd consider it a good purchase.

       

      It's not really how long it'll last me, it's more like how long it'll keep me engaged.

×
×
  • Create New...