Jump to content

Windows 8


deanb
 Share

Recommended Posts

But "Coca-Cola" is just a brand name and nothing else, whereas "Metro" is just a word that means "city". You couldn't make a "Coca-Cola" brand car without getting into trouble, but you could easily make a "Cola" brand car. If they had named the interface "Metro AG" then yeah, but I don't think Metro alone is or should be enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My point is that we don't know enough to know if it is a spurious claim by Metro AG, or if it has merit. MS obviously think that either (a) The claim has merit, or (b) They don't care anything like enough to even bother defending their use of the name (possibly because they already have another name lined up).

 

It's not like MS is short a few quid or a few lawyers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was an internal Microsoft memo sent by the legal team that said the company was threatened with legal action over the name. That almost certainly means trademark. The only speculation is that Metro AG was the one upset about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

logos.jpg

well, looking at the style philosophy, foursquare would be a great name. You're welcome, Microsoft.

 

https://foursquare.com/

 

edit: I should also mention that Bing searches include Foursquare results now as part of their social searches.

Edited by Faiblesse Des Sens
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

http://www.geek.com/articles/geek-pick/windows-8-gets-personal-use-license-for-anyone-building-their-own-pc-20120821/

 

So hobby builders now get their own proper version of Windows instead of picking up an OEM copy. Not much changes except now we don't have to hit "agree" to a EULA that says you're meant to be Dell not Adele.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get why personal PC builders shouldn't just get the full retail version?

Because it normally costs a fuckton more. Also best I can read this replaces both the normal retail version and weird requirements OEM version. You have Upgrade, OEM (proper), and thus personal builder one. Which makes sense (and works out cheaper).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get that OEM is cheaper than full retail, and if in Windows 8 they're replacing the two personal-use versions with one personal-use version that makes sense, but going back to previous versions of windows, I still don't get why just because someone is building their own PC they (think they) should be getting a cheaper version of their OS?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're asking the question I think you're asking it's worth pointing out that MS has seemingly scrapped the traditional retail version in favour of this semi-OEM version. So the proper question should be "Why was MS charging 3 times as much for pretty much the exact same version of the OEM edition, with just a bit of phone support no one used anyway and a weird plastic box"?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...