Jump to content

Osama Dun Goofed


Can
 Share

Recommended Posts

That's not FOX News. It's a local affiliate.

 

Also what makes this news so good? Osama wasn't even doing anything anymore. Nothing is going to change because of this.

 

Indeed, nothing will. It's just that, well, after 10 years searching for a guy all over the world, ya kinda hafta celebrate, you know?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Basically what staySICK said.

 

Like I said in Dean's status update, if this had happened years ago, it would have been a much bigger event. Yes, Osama hasn't done much since 9/11, but much like a typical murderer, your life essentially ends because authorities are after you.

 

In this case, Osama had the entire United States Armed Forces trying to capture his ass.

 

So while there will be other terrorists, at least the man responsible for thousands of deaths has been put down. The man who caused a child's father to never come home from work, for a man to become a widower as soon as his wife left one morning, and a grandparent to never see their grandchild from New York.

 

It took almost a decade, but the bastard is dead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Osama should of died ten years ago. Hell, he almost did. Back then it would of made a difference in the war in Afghanistan. Now... eh. Prior to this news, it would of been a lot better to take him alive. Well, he's dead so nothing can be done about that...

 

At least the person who headed all this is out of the picture. Maybe now we can finally pull out of Afghanistan... after an aggressive push to get the rest of the Al Qaeda leadership, along with a PR improvement on our part and the Afghanistan's government part. A year or two... maybe? Eh. I agree with the push into Afghanistan (Iraq, not at all) but man, this war got to end someday. Hearing and seeing about this war for almost half my life is tiring. This hopefully is a push into that direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So while there will be other terrorists, at least the man responsible for thousands of deaths has been put down. The man who caused a child's father to never come home from work, for a man to become a widower as soon as his wife left one morning, and a grandparent to never see their grandchild from New York.

 

Next up: George W. Bush!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been reading up on where this assault took place... a 5-stories mansion, which makes it one or the largest building in town. Take into account that the place is only sixty-something miles from the capital... it seems to point that at least some part of the government were hiding him. I think everyone was expecting him to be in the Tribal Region, not in such a large town/city.

 

Pakistan got some explaining to do. However...

 

Going off how Obama didn't mentioned Pakistani intelligence... I think. Did we go at this operation alone? We got some explaining to do as well.

 

Chances are though, we'll never hear about it. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obama's address said that intelligence received a lead back in August. It wasn't much to go on, but I guess you can't be picky when it comes to tracking high profile terrorists.

 

Anyway, I believe in the address Obama said a plan was formulated last week, so this isn't a "What the- Osama is here" ordeal. A lot of careful planning went in to ensure things went by smoothly, and of all things to not let him escape after such a long period of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It feels weird, I was nine years old when 9/11 happened, and now after all this time the man who is said to be responsible for it is dead.

 

However, I'm not naive enough to think that Al Qaeda are going to surrender, or that this is a true victory for America. Yes, it's a victory for justice and a small victory for America. People are ecstatic that he's dead, and with good reason, of course, but the real problem is what is going to happen next. Al Qaeda aren't going to just lay down their arms now. They have a martyr and someone will step up to the plate and I suspect there'll be some more serious (not 9/11 serious, but serious) terrorist attacks in the near future.

 

However, enough with the pessimism. For now, let us rejoice that the man responsible for claiming the lives of thousands of innocent people has finally been dealt justice after ten long years. See you in hell, Bin Laden.

Edited by Connorrrr
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's Osama been doing for the last ten years? :s the fact he's dead is.pretty anticlimatic now

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madrid_Train_Bombing

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_July_2005_London_bombings

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mumbai_attacks

 

It's interesting how we forget about things that don't happen in our own country.

 

Anyway, it's interesting to note that this compound that he was in was close to a Pakistani military compound and apparently only a block away from a Pakistani police station. Obama said nothing about a "joint military operation" which coincides with reports we're hearing that we went in without telling Pakistan. Honestly considering it's pretty clear they've been protecting him I'm sure they made sure not to inform the Pakistani government or else they probably would have warned him.

 

Also, note Pakistan's "cover-your-ass" move by saying it was a "joint operation" and that they're glad that he's been killed/captured. If people weren't so war-weary already something tells me that there would be another coalition-type gathering to "liberate" Pakistan.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I'm sure a guy hiding in Pakistan as the world's most notorious terrorist had nothing to do with Pakistani terrorists. But yeah, the alleged mastermind behind killing three-thousand Americans is no bfd. :rolleyes:

 

Maybe you should just stick with the whole "Bush is a baby-killer" bit.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you're missing my point. al-Qaeda has already been operating without Osama and will continue to do so. The same can be said every other terrorist organization. This is only significant in the sense that he was a figure head and al-Qaeda is big on mind games. Plus, Bush is a baby killer? Way to add in something I never said. Really makes your argument solid.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you're missing my point. al-Qaeda has already been operating without Osama and will continue to do so.

That's pretty much it. Everywhere I hear people talking about this, they speak of it as if something productive had actually happened. Nothing has.

 

I doubt that killing a spokesman for a terrorist organization really does much in the first place.

 

Also, obligatory:

 

1tyfj.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's Osama been doing for the last ten years? :s the fact he's dead is.pretty anticlimatic now

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madrid_Train_Bombing

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_July_2005_London_bombings

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mumbai_attacks

 

It's interesting how we forget about things that don't happen in our own country.

 

Anyway, it's interesting to note that this compound that he was in was close to a Pakistani military compound and apparently only a block away from a Pakistani police station. Obama said nothing about a "joint military operation" which coincides with reports we're hearing that we went in without telling Pakistan. Honestly considering it's pretty clear they've been protecting him I'm sure they made sure not to inform the Pakistani government or else they probably would have warned him.

 

Also, note Pakistan's "cover-your-ass" move by saying it was a "joint operation" and that they're glad that he's been killed/captured. If people weren't so war-weary already something tells me that there would be another coalition-type gathering to "liberate" Pakistan.

 

I'm British :P so I'm aware about the London bombings, but how much of "Al-Queda" was Bin Laden? I know they claim to have perpetuated every act of terrorism ever, but the London Bombings had no direct links to him, though some to the orginisation. The Madrid bombings were never even claimed by Al-Queda. I'm not saying that terrorist attacks haven't existed, but I wonder how much influence he really had considering his focus on evading capture?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...