Jump to content

Xbox One


Yantelope
 Share

Recommended Posts

Oh don't get me wrong - it's fine on the consumer side (probably) and it probably is sound for Microsoft but Microsoft's bread and butter comes from corporate businesses. In fact consumer division including Xbox only accounts for less than 20% of their revenue.

 

Edit for full disclosure: I do have a vested interest in seeing Microsoft succeed. I know at least 25 people working in middle to senior positions there 4 of whom were classmates. I own some stock in the company (so of course I want to see them profit but I'd like Apple, TWX and GOOG to succeed as well). I have friends who are part of MSDN, paid for by their companies and investment banker friends who are heavily invested in them. And for the record Office365 is actually quite practical in the professional space and is something that I could recommend companies who want to stick with MS Office as for a yearly fee it prevents them from facing the constant upgrades.

Also to note: MS has done a lot of things good but they do not have a clear strategy with Windows and it needs to be rectified. Windows 8 could be good for consumers but it currently faces an identity crisis and is not going to be released in this version at least from inside sources. However the version in plan for corporates is significantly eh and lol not all my friends who worked at MS worked on great projects either. One of them was working on Longhorn which we know how it turned out, however he left them for Motorola (Which turned out to be interesting to say the least).

 

I'm just saying what I know based on well their rumblings and this was about a month ago. I can criticise their decisions which don't seem ideal.

 

Also to note: While MS would want to continue on with their Xbox business as it is highly successful they have much more interesting things planned outside of the console space and like they said they could terminate XBLA if they thought it wasn't profitable anymore.

Edited by WTF
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

http://www.computerandvideogames.com/343191/next-xbox-to-boast-ridiculously-powerful-16-core-cpu/

 

So this was interesting, but is obviously full of shit. Rumors say that the next Xbox is going to come fully loaded with a 16-core IBM PowerPC processor and a GPU of the Radeon HD-7000 architecture. This is obviously not true.

 

For one, that kind of tech isn't even available for high-end PCs, and AMD only released the 1st 16-core business class processor a year ago, so the likelihood that a game console is going to use brand new processing tech in a console is ridiculous. Even if it were true, can you imagine how insanely expensive that'll make the damn machine? Games don't even utilize quad-cores(current games use 2 cores at most), so 14 cores are just going to sit there uselessly.

 

But hey, spec rumors are flying out, so they always make for interesting reads and speculations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so the likelihood that a game console is going to use brand new processing tech in a console is ridiculous.

 

...wait, what the hell was Cell technology then?

 

Even if it were true, can you imagine how insanely expensive that'll make the damn machine?

 

I don't know man, maybe it'll be 600 US DOLLARS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least this one gets the damn architecture right.

 

8-core would sound reasonable. Pretty decent jump up from the tri-core of the 360 without being too silly a jump. The reasoning, i.e "Kinect 2 could use whole cores" seems silly, since I'd reckon in a Kinect 2 they'll probably go back with the original plans and put the chip back inside the Kinect itself. Though maybe the Devkit is powered by that, if only to be more powerful than the base machine to let em run code better or something. I can't imagine devkit machines for PSP only had a 333mhz CPU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...wait, what the hell was Cell technology then?

 

 

You got me there, but it was still expensive then... But even now, most games on the PS3 and the 360 don't utilize the full processing capabilities, so bumping it up to 16 cores is just silly.

 

Is that really true? What are the reasons? I've always assumed this was just shoddy work by devs unfamiliar with either system. But I think they've maxed out on it's uses...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure most games these days are using the full processing power of the consoles. There's still areas of optimisation that can be potentially utilised but you'd have to be a silly dev to have your game not use all the power available, especially when games are struggling to churn out reasonable FPS n resolutions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I speak mostly for PC games, I'm honestly not sure if the 360 has games that uses all 3 cores. I do know that the grand majority of PC games try to limit themselves to 2 cores at a time. Using more tends to be problematic and strenuous on the processor, since it has to use more effort to synchronize the operations from each core. Using too many will cause sync issues and bottlenecks the processing. So, processors usually handle work between 2-3 cores while the GPU does most of the heavy stuff. The remaining cores tend to pick up the slack on background programs running. Again, I only speak from a PC standpoint, so I can't say this is completely accurate for consoles.

 

And I would assume that 1st party devs have more control over the specs of their platform than any 3rd party dev out there. Pretty sure that's why the 1st party titles look gorgeous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...

 

Yeah, after reading and assessing countless comments on forums and news sites, the word on the street seems to be that this document is real, just obsolete; the state of affairs from mid-2010 when they published this document. There are other important facets to their plan which aren't documented here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

They're moving in with the final phase of their ultimate battle plan, which was a multimedia Microsoft PC in your living room. They wanted that back with the original Xbox, though at most it'd rip CDs and I think maybe stream over the network. Now you have multiple options to control the TV without having to use a gaming controller, in Kinect n Smartglass (And the remote if you have it), and it pulls in video from a wide variety of sources. And it plays games too.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rumor floating around is you may be able to get a next Xbox for $99 if you sign up with a two year contract with specified cable companies. I think its a brilliant idea but I may be in the minority, if I'm going to get cable Tv, and a new xbox why not get rid of the box rental fee and lower my xbox price tag at the same time?

Edited by madbassman39
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...