Jump to content

Site Donations


deanb
 Share

Recommended Posts

Everything_burns____by_JackQuinn18.jpg

 

WHY IS NO ONE VOTING FOR FFIX!!!

Also I'd be tempted for a "super donator" level but you voted for VII so no super-donator for you. (Though I really should fish about to see what extra features and tweaks I could do. Like do something to the site for a month in your honour or something.)

 

I don't do it for the rewards. Love this community. Happy to support it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Click on one of the three Final Fantasy logos in the first post.  Which one you click constitutes a vote for that one, but doesn't actually have any effect beyond a silly game to find out the popularity of those games on here.

 

*Edit* - Though dean might have an aneurysm if someone doesn't vote for FFIX.

Edited by TheMightyEthan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

Right:

Lowest tier VPS is $15/month($180). Currently we* pay $10.95/month for shared hosting.

Forum software is about $30/6 months.

Domain is $15/year.

 

If there was interest $50(and $10/6month) gets the community blog stuff for the forum too.

 

Currently there's $30 in the kitty (merci Ethan).

 

I should add that's the lowest tier price. It then jumps to $30/month, then all the way up to $200/month (which I'd hope wouldn't need ever)

 

*just me the past few months

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do we think moving to VPS would help with the slow site?  If so, I'd be all for it, but I also don't want to pressure you into more expensive hosting since you often end up covering it out of your own pocket (not that you should, you should let us know when we're running low ;) ).

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

More than likely would. I'll enquire with Dreamhost and see what they say (though obviously they'd be all pro-higher monthly amount) on the topic. I asked at work and the web developer said it'd be overkill, but I think he's thinking of the kind we use since he also gave a ballpark figure of £100/month(for us it includes support and much fancier features than what DH have). But for $4/month extra "overkill" would be quite fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I hit up Dreamhost about it. The have a week trail to figure out the requirements of the server. They kinda ducked on the "what happens if it's over the lower tier" question mind. Hopefully it's not a case of in a week whatever it goes to I then have to pay.

 

I wouldn't mind a bit of a nod that folks are up for continuing with donations mind, should the forum be upgraded, even on lower tier that's an extra $60 I'd have to cover should donations wholly dry up. I wouldn't mind covering it, though it's a bit of a "money where mouth is" on the slowness issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I work from home now, and it gets boring so I'm hitting up the site lately. Unfortunately it's also a bit slow, so most times I just give up.

 

I know stuff is posted on the first post, but maybe a google doc sheet would be better? It's bookmark-able and it's a spreadsheet too so we can track lots of numbers and could use advanced functions like automatically summing up cells to come up with totals!! In any case, I made a donation and I hope it helps. I'm all for a faster site too...

 

With E3 coming around, I know we all are going to have lots to say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's on shared, so if any other site pushes out resources (or ourselves as well, we got "killed" a few times) then it all goes to poop. This it's currently 2,300MB (of which we're using 300mb and next week will likely be going down to) entirely dedicated, can't get it pushed out. Also we were on 142MB(or 124MB) for the forum, which I had had to tweak bits to get that much RAM allocated for us(which is why the site would get killed). So yeah, 300MB is twice that, and you can see from the above graph, 200MB is the comfort zone.

 

@Ethan:

 

I'd assume it keeps a bunch of the tables for the sites in memory rather than dynamically retrieving it on the fly, which might be what was killing the forum, given over the years we've obviously ended up with bigger tables. Hence my attempting to slice up some of the longer lasting larger threads and enabling the archive feature (btw if there's a thread you want un-archiving pipe up). Which sort of alleviated it, but I could only do so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...