Jump to content

Piracy


Cyber Rat
 Share

Recommended Posts

Piracy of a product that is otherwise officially & legally available to you is wrong. Piracy of a product that is legally available but you would not buy anyway is wrong, but it's wrong like lying to your boss about being sick so you can go to a football game is wrong (i.e. only in an academic, doesn't-really-matter kind of way).

 

tumblr_lprdu9GN6v1qzfihm.jpg

 

In seriousness, I would label both piracy and your lying to the boss example as morally grey. They aren't exactly right, but I can't really judge anyone for it either.

Unless, of course, you're pirating just to be a dick. Then you're just being a dick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@elev3n: that's like saying that buying a GPS is cheating other consumers because I could use it to cheat in a wilderness navigation competition.

 

If it's allowed to buy a GPS, then yes. You stole the GPS (I think you would agree that I used the correct word here!), and bought better wilderness stuff with your money, while I bought better wilderness stuff with my money, but no GPS since I can't afford it after all those expensive gear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then you can't even use the GPS in the first place. In my example, software use is allowed, i thought that was implied.

 

Why would you get it then? Just because? Yeah well downloading that software illegally is not cheating by itself. However, it was used. Why would you pirate if you don't intend to use it? If you got the GPS but didn't use it, then it's no big deal to me. You just made yourself $150 poorer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Piracy of a product that is otherwise officially & legally available to you is wrong.

 

Good thing piracy has cases where this is not true. Plus, you're making it black and white. What about CD keys you've used 3 times on your own systems that you can't use anymore? I can't believe you're trying to make such a basic argument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@elev3n: lol, this is why metaphors are bad, they just end up confusing everything.

 

What I meant is that not every use of pirated software constitutes cheating other users. If I pirate Photoshop and use it to make silly pictures to post on this forum the only person I've cheated is Adobe (putting aside that they seem to encourage Photoshop piracy...)

 

*Edit* - @FDS: Well, I would make a distinction between pirating a product and just cracking one you bought, but fine, throw an "in general" on the front of that, and know that I acknowledge there are exceptions but that it's impractical to list every exception.

Edited by TheMightyEthan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, don't post that picture on reddit! Your fancier image with your fancy pirated Photoshop will net you more karma than my MS Painted one. So unfair.

 

I concede. In any event, the original point was semantics. They are all, for the purpose of this discussion, the same to me.

 

Also, from now on, there will be no such things as stolen recipes and stolen ideas. I didn't steal your ideas, I copied it. It's morally grey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as cheating "the competition" we were actively encouraged to pirate adobe n autodesk software in college. So everyone was pretty much on a level playing field in that. (As Ethan said they sort of encourage that too. Unless you're a business then they'll come down hard, but student use is awesome for them cos they know when you're in a position to be buying software, well if Photoshop is king of the torrents then you'll be buying that instead of Paintshop Pro.)

 

As far as games go, about the only competition between two gamers would be their skill at MP and achievements. Most pirated games you can't really do the MP, at least against paying customers, and don't get achievements.

 

Copying recipes would be patent infringement. I think this is where a lot of the issues arrive in discussion is that for most folks patents,copyrights n trademarks are the same thing.

 

The disc the game goes on and the engine that runs it - patented

The name on the box - trademarked

The characters and locations within the game - copyright.

 

And the rules weren't really meant to get at "the little people" but the big people. i.e to stop...Square from making a game set in Hyrule. Or Atlus making a "Legend of Zelda" game. Or Nintendo making a controller with a glowing orb on the end. It's why Disney tends to be at the forefront of copyright laws, they don't do it to stop joe bloggs from torrenting Beauty and the Beast, they do it to stop Dreamworks from making a Mickey Mouse movie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't really pirate much. If I do it's usually music I can't buy on itunes or really old games that you can't find anywhere else, and even then it's a pretty rare occasion. That being said, I do NOT like the idea of my ISP sniffing through my data. I'm a private person and it just gives me the heebie jeebies. Even if you don't have anything to hide, nobody likes going through customs.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not read up on iTunes recently, but I think the common complaint is that next to no money from that goes to the musicians themselves in most cases. Some people would argue that it's effectively just as bad as pirating it.

 

What I tend to do is, I primarily prefer to go to concerts as my way of supporting artists, secondarily buy albums from them. (I'd rather buy the physical disc so I don't have to worry about DRM and other such utter nonsense, and can rip it to any format I want)

I wish more artists would tour up here. Only group I liked in recent memory up here was Machinae Supremacy, and they only tour here because this is where they live. :P

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ubisoft, being reasonable? Am I hallucinating?

 

http://www.joystiq.c...ort-and-conten/

 

Yes. To me that says they will relax, not end their DRM practices, once no one pirates their games. So if someone pirates them, they'll still be jerks.

 

Yeah, that's how I read it too, but in my book any wavering from their draconian drm practices is a sign of reasonableness. It shows that they're not going to just blindly stick to their "piracy is bad, we must try to prevent it" outlook forever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's like refusing to pay full price for a steak dinner if you're asked if you'd like to add mac & cheese as a side. :P

 

Exactly. Yes, the mac & cheese is already available. It makes no sense to not offer it with the steak. I'm not going to buy an incomplete steak unless you add the mac & cheese for free.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...