Jump to content

PCs for dummies


Strangelove
 Share

Recommended Posts

Truth be told I can't really blow it all at once, but as far as the setup goes, it does look good.

 

How would "dual" graphics cards work? I imagine the motherboard has to be formatted to utilize two. Speaking of...

 

Intel or AMD motherboard? I feel like in the past I've always had trouble with AMD, but wouldn't an AMD graphics card (if I got one) be more "at home" with an AMD motherboard? Everything else I can handle, like the HDDs/SSDs, PSU, and etc.

 

It's the motherboard and graphics card that stump me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I would actually of those two setups recommend the single-GPU one.  I just picked those two because they were the only two combos I saw within your price range that wouldn't require immediately (as in, right now) upgrading the graphics card to something better.

 

Both Intel and AMD make mobos that support SLI (Nvidia's dual-card solution) and both make mobos that support Crossfire (AMD's dual-card solution).  If you're planning to do dual cards at any time then you need to look to make sure the board supports it.  But it's perfectly fine to mix and match mobo and graphics card brands.  In my experience I've had a lot fewer issues with Nvidia cards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An optional thing to consider if PhysX is something you want. Chances are you'll just use it for games (that supports it). It'll make the game seem much more prettier... If you do then jump for a Nvidia card. I'm quite sure there is an AMD equivalent as well, I just can't pin down the name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How often do you buy new graphics cards to even make that statement?

 

Since I've started building my own PCs I've had IIRC 3 Nvidia cards and 2 ATI cards.

 

*Edit* - TressFX runs like shit on Nvidia cards, it only really runs right on ATI cards.

Edited by TheMightyEthan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yo, I think I found my graphics card.

 

EDIT #2: [Got rid of the old graphics cards because...]

 

I took it upon myself to do more research, and thus I think I should (unless otherwise) go with the...

 

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 660 2GB 192-bit GDDR5

 

I went through Newegg's lists at least three times, and this one will run a little better and cooler than the MSI equivalent. As for any Ti version, I probably will forgo it. I honest don't think I would need it, though the MSI Twin Frozr IV has a neat feature of running the fans in reverse for 30 seconds to clear dust off.

 

But that's not worth an extra $100!

Edited by Atomsk88
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, sure, if you wanna see...

 

 

Right at the 3:26 mark it's mentioned. Again, this Ti version runs a bit better than the two cards I've been looking at, but I'm not sure if I can really afford an extra $100.

 

Speaking of...

 

I've been thinking of going with an Intel processor, but I'm noticing AMD processors seem to run a bit cheaper. If I was to go with Intel, how much is enough for a gaming PC? How many Ghz, and should it be i3, i5, or i7?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dug around and I believe this would be a good processor.

 

Intel Core i5-3350P Ivy Bridge 3.1GHz LGA 1155 69W

 

Considering I'm getting a graphics card, I don't need integrated graphics and so that cuts down on the cost. I'll search around for a motherboard, but another question: If the motherboard says "77W," does that mean my processor has to be 77W, or that it can handle up to 77W?

Edited by Atomsk88
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Question!

 

I'm getting close to choosing all my components, but I've come across some reviews/comments about how a motherboard for gaming purposes shouldn't have HDMI, DVI, or VGA ports. I understand that my video connection will come from the graphics card, but it doesn't seem like there are that many great boards to choose from if they don't video output onboard.

 

So I take it that it's a bunch of butthurt rather than a valid complaint?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought the folks had a copy of Windows 7 laying around, but when I found it, I saw (and remembered) it's the upgrade pack.

 

So it seems I'll be spending $100 to get Windows 7.

 

Unless anyone has a compelling argument for Windows 8, but it seems like I should be just fine with good ol' #7.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're paying full retail price anyway, there isn't much reason to get 7 nowadays IMO. 8 may have its quirks, but at its core it's just a mostly improved 7, nothing on the level of the Vista/XP shenanigans. Just go with 8 if you're going to pay 100 bucks for it anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming it's $100 for Windows 8 as well (I think the early bird program ended a while ago now), might as well go with Windows 7 which is exactly like Windows 7 over Windows 8 which is "pretty much going to be like 7". Then you know all your programs, and drivers, and games all work fine too. And also not hedging your bets on if Windows 8.1 will improve the situation or not (since it's still early days on details/news on it, and no preview yet so far).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...