TheMightyEthan Posted February 22, 2013 Report Share Posted February 22, 2013 On 2/22/2013 at 11:46 AM, Thursday Next said: Reveal hidden contents To be honest though, they could work it so that you can pick whether Cole was good or bad, and just throw in another ray-sphere activation to bring back Supers. Reveal hidden contents That fucks the canon though! If the supers were wiped out it was supposed to kill not just the activated ones, but all the people who even carried the gene, meaning another ray sphere wouldn't do anything. Think of the canon! /nerd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Jack Posted February 22, 2013 Report Share Posted February 22, 2013 Won't someone PLEASE think of the canon!? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMightyEthan Posted February 22, 2013 Report Share Posted February 22, 2013 http://www.joystiq.com/2013/02/22/infamous-second-son-coughs-up-details-on-smoky-hero-seattle-se/ The main character is 24, so he's not Cole's son unless Cole already had a 17-year-old son we didn't know about. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Jack Posted February 22, 2013 Report Share Posted February 22, 2013 Smoke based powers immediately brought to mind this guy: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thursday Next Posted February 22, 2013 Report Share Posted February 22, 2013 On 2/22/2013 at 1:12 PM, TheMightyEthan said: On 2/22/2013 at 11:46 AM, Thursday Next said: Reveal hidden contents To be honest though, they could work it so that you can pick whether Cole was good or bad, and just throw in another ray-sphere activation to bring back Supers. Reveal hidden contents That fucks the canon though! If the supers were wiped out it was supposed to kill not just the activated ones, but all the people who even carried the gene, meaning another ray sphere wouldn't do anything. Think of the canon! /nerd Oh, thought it was just the activated ones. That's that then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deanb Posted February 22, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 22, 2013 Isn't it based in the UK anyway? I kinda figured from that he wasn't related to Cole directly or distantly. Just a different Conduit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMightyEthan Posted February 22, 2013 Report Share Posted February 22, 2013 It's set in Seattle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnstableArk Posted February 22, 2013 Report Share Posted February 22, 2013 Seattle, London. Same thing, right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deanb Posted February 22, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 22, 2013 Why the fuck did he start talking about UK then? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMightyEthan Posted February 22, 2013 Report Share Posted February 22, 2013 idk, I must have missed that part of the presentation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deanb Posted February 22, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 22, 2013 A minor brain refresher. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMightyEthan Posted February 22, 2013 Report Share Posted February 22, 2013 Oh right. He also talked about stuff in the US though. I think they were just talking about police-state-type stuff in general. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Faiblesse Des Sens Posted February 22, 2013 Report Share Posted February 22, 2013 I can't remember, did the UK really did get mentioned?He mentions being pepper sprayed in 1999. In 1999 were the WTO riots in Seattle. Sucker Punch is based out of Bellevue, which is right across the water from Seattle, so this guy is local... so no idea what's up with a UK mention. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hot Heart Posted February 22, 2013 Report Share Posted February 22, 2013 He mentioned Britain in part of a series of statistics (number of security cameras). Nothing to suggest it was solely about Britain. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Faiblesse Des Sens Posted February 22, 2013 Report Share Posted February 22, 2013 Oh yeah, now I can remember. 1 camera for every 13 people or something. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deanb Posted February 22, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 22, 2013 Worth noting a sketchy feed for a fair chunk of the viewing so stuff might slip through the cracks if he specifically mentioned Seattle. Might grab the feed in full and re-watch some point this weekend. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Faiblesse Des Sens Posted February 22, 2013 Report Share Posted February 22, 2013 Well they don't use real cities but just base the games off them so Seattle is never directly mentioned but the wide shot of the city is pretty obviously Seattle. Source: I fucking live in Seattle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luftwaffles Posted February 23, 2013 Report Share Posted February 23, 2013 \\ I'd even go so far as to say it's directly mentioned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Faiblesse Des Sens Posted February 23, 2013 Report Share Posted February 23, 2013 Haha. I'm guessing they rushed to put that out considering that's not what the space needle looks like in game. Definitely a Chronicle vibe to that pic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockyRan Posted February 23, 2013 Report Share Posted February 23, 2013 Highlight of the presentation for me, considering both inFamous games are the highlight of the PS3 for me. GIMME GIMME GIMME 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMightyEthan Posted February 23, 2013 Report Share Posted February 23, 2013 According to that Joystiq article I posted it really is set in the real Seattle, which they specifically mentioned as being a change from the fictional cities of previous games. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deanb Posted May 12, 2013 Author Report Share Posted May 12, 2013 http://www.gameinformer.com/b/features/archive/2013/05/10/bridging-the-gap-from-infamous-2-to-second-son.aspx 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hot Heart Posted May 13, 2013 Report Share Posted May 13, 2013 Well that explains it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CorgiShinobi Posted May 14, 2013 Report Share Posted May 14, 2013 Kinda funny, and to be honest the "78% Good" trophy stat might not mean much when you consider a lot of people got the trophy for Bad as well. I mean, I most certainly did. I guess it means a little something if people, in their first and only choice, chose Good, then you might have a decently higher percentage over how many witnessed Bad. I did say it was funny though because it nerfs the ultimate choice at the end of Infamous 2. Oops, the RFI didn't quite do its job! However, all is forgiven if Cole makes a cameo. If we're going with an established imperfection, then we must have an imperfect sacrifice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TCP Posted May 14, 2013 Report Share Posted May 14, 2013 Clearly this is just because they're planning a sequel to the "bad" ending for Vita. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.