Jump to content

Mass Effect


AcidCrownie
 Share

Andromeda  

10 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you plan to get Mass Effect Andromeda?

    • Yes
      5
    • No
      1
    • Maybe, I need to see more
      3
    • Already have it preordered
      1
  2. 2. If you are getting Andromeda, what system will you play it on?

    • Playstation 4
      5
    • Xbox One
      0
    • PC
      4
    • I'm delusional and think I'll be able to get it on Switch
      1


Recommended Posts

I agree that some of the stuff was unnecessary

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

Overall though I think this is a definite improvement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 6/27/2012 at 11:02 PM, Waldorf And Statler said:

Strangelove weren't you just saying that you hated people being negative towards stuff you like?

 

Yeah, what's your point? I liked the endings even before they were expanded. I also dont feel the new expansions to be detrimental. I like those too. Im not being negative towards them, I just think theyre obvious. I like stuff. Its what I do.

I just hate people. I dont mind that. Youre free to hate whoever you want. These endings arent about to change any minds, especially the ones who signed petitions and sent cupcakes, the folks who needed these most wont get any benefit from this. The only ones who will like this are the ones who already liked the endings as they were or just thought they were "ok."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really? It didn't change anything. Same ending and everything. I cant see how it logically goes from "shit" to "good" when there's no difference in it's conclusion, which is all it is. They just basically added "and everyone lived happily ever after, for the most part" to the end. Which is something I assumed anyways. There was already proof of that in the basic ending anyways.

I just don't see how these endings were so confusing to people. And Im not trying to insult people's intelligence, but I just cant see how expanding it changed it.

 

Its like people wanting an explanation on why their girlfriend broke up with them. No matter what the reason, they still broke up with you. It wont make you feel any better and closure isnt instant, it takes a while to truly grasp it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I really didn't like the original endings either and I like these a lot.

 

And I can't speak for others, but

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't have a problem with what happened in the ending ever, I just had a problem with how it was completely not fleshed out. They've fleshed it out now so I'm happy.

 

In fact, where they actually did change events, like

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

it kind of bugged me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not so much that everyone needed an explanation, just that the whole thing was poorly-paced and abrupt with a few glaring plotholes or just dumb crap. And it's always nice to see a better denouement rather than a vague, suggestive one. It was the end of a trilogy, not a two-hour film. Not one for analogies but no one would've liked LOTR to end with the ring falling into the lava, followed by a clip of eagles flying to Mount Doom, Aragon wearing a crown and Gandalf getting on a ship (although that film could've done with a few less endings...)

 

Plus, I think the more important bit was fleshing out the starkid nonsense and it helped assert the themes and ideas a lot more clearly.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 6/27/2012 at 11:32 PM, TheMightyEthan said:

Yeah, I really didn't like the original endings either and I like these a lot.

 

And I can't speak for others, but

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 6/27/2012 at 11:38 PM, Hot Heart said:

It's not so much that everyone needed an explanation, just that the whole thing was poorly-paced and abrupt with a few glaring plotholes or just dumb crap. And it's always nice to see a better denouement rather than a vague, suggestive one. It was the end of a trilogy, not a two-hour film. Not one for analogies but no one would've liked LOTR to end with the ring falling into the lava, followed by a clip of eagles flying to Mount Doom, Aragon wearing a crown and Gandalf getting on a ship (although that film could've done with a few less endings...)

 

Plus, I think the more important bit was fleshing out the starkid nonsense and it helped assert the themes and ideas a lot more clearly.

 

Actually, I would have liked a shorter ending to Return of The King. The ending was awful because of how long it was. Did we really need verification that they went off to do what they set out to do? Did 20 endings really hold anything else other than things people can just assume?

After all was said and done, the endings didnt really matter after the ring was destroyed.

 

Seriously, that was such an awful ending.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 6/27/2012 at 11:47 PM, Hot Heart said:

With the Normandy thing it was more...

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 6/27/2012 at 11:42 PM, Strangelove said:
  On 6/27/2012 at 11:32 PM, TheMightyEthan said:

Yeah, I really didn't like the original endings either and I like these a lot.

 

And I can't speak for others, but

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

I don't even see how that relates to what I wrote...

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 6/27/2012 at 11:38 PM, Hot Heart said:

Not one for analogies but no one would've liked LOTR to end with the ring falling into the lava, followed by a clip of eagles flying to Mount Doom, Aragon wearing a crown and Gandalf getting on a ship (although that film could've done with a few less endings...).

Actually the film had less endings than the book, disappointingly so for some of us. And in the Extended Edition (the version of the trilogy so long each film is split across two books) they changed it so Wormtounge stabs Saruman and he falls off Isengard, instead of the original book ending of them sneaking out n taking over Hobbiton while folks are resting in Rivendell. It's why Galadriel gives Sam a tree seed, he uses it to replace the trees cut down by Sarumans fledgling second army.

 

...I'll shut up now :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 6/27/2012 at 11:51 PM, TheMightyEthan said:
  On 6/27/2012 at 11:42 PM, Strangelove said:
  On 6/27/2012 at 11:32 PM, TheMightyEthan said:

Yeah, I really didn't like the original endings either and I like these a lot.

 

And I can't speak for others, but

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

I don't even see how that relates to what I wrote...

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Edited by Strangelove
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re "WHEN it happened": exactly.

 

  On 6/28/2012 at 12:00 AM, Strangelove said:
  Reveal hidden contents

 

It does, but

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, god, it was never about a happy ending, that's for sure. The whole game is 'victory through sacrifice'. Though there are lots of stupid people who think differently.

 

  On 6/27/2012 at 11:50 PM, Strangelove said:

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People weren't bothered that it wasn't all sunshine n rainbows (much, you were at least able to come out perfect on the suicide mission of 2 if you played cards right, but ME3 didn't really present that possibility). Actually did you palky ME2? Just you commented earlier you wouldn't expect your squad to participate in some act of suicide in potentially rescuing shepard, when they went on a suicide mission at the end of 2 so it's certainly on the cards for them. (Actually didn't you only play ME2, you were a PS3 player yeah?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 6/28/2012 at 12:09 AM, Hot Heart said:

Oh, god, it was never about a happy ending, that's for sure. The whole game is 'victory through sacrifice'. Though there are lots of stupid people who think differently.

 

  On 6/27/2012 at 11:50 PM, Strangelove said:

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 6/28/2012 at 12:15 AM, Strangelove said:

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 6/28/2012 at 12:17 AM, Hot Heart said:
  On 6/28/2012 at 12:15 AM, Strangelove said:

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

Ok. That makes more sense. I never really noticed that.

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, my squad mates

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  Reveal hidden contents

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...