Jump to content

Fucking Kotaku


Mr. GOH!
 Share

  

100 members have voted

  1. 1. Who's your least favorite Kotaku writer or contributor?

    • Brian Crecente
      18
    • Brian Ashcraft
      24
    • Stephen Totilo
      1
    • Mike Fahey
      3
    • Owen Good
      5
    • Luke Plunkett
      10
    • Tim Rogers
      17
    • Lisa Foiles
      5
    • Mike McWhertor [ex-editor]
      1
    • Kirk Hamilton
      1
    • Joel Johnson
      15
    • Evan Narcisse
      0
  2. 2. Who's your favorite Kotaku writer or contributor?

    • Brian Crecente
      5
    • Brian Ashcraft
      9
    • Stephen Totilo
      34
    • Mike Fahey
      8
    • Owen Good
      21
    • Luke Plunkett
      6
    • Tim Rogers
      6
    • Lisa Foiles
      2
    • Mike McWhertor [ex-editor]
      7
    • Joel Johnson
      0
    • Kirk Hamilton
      2
    • Evan Narcisse
      0


Recommended Posts

I remember reading that the biggest concern of a writer of the Times was that the future would be unbearable. The demand for transport would be so great due to increased population, that we wouldn't be able to clean the streets from the carriage horse dung.

 

And then then we got cars. :wub:

 

Also, PC gaming has the same visuals as the PS3 because consoles are holding them back, due to almost everything being multiplatform.

Edited by Cyber Rat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do Xbox games running on six-year-old hardware look nearly as good as a modern PC games?

What the fuck is he smoking/playing on? Actually don't answer that hte rest of the article spells that out*

 

It's time to buck and realize that the Apple model of hardware isn't just one way to do it—it's the way hardware has to go to move forward.

What is the "Apple model of hardware"? Make things really expensive? If it was the way to do it then surely they'd have more than 8% PC market share?

 

The Razer Blade is the first credible competitor to Apple from the PC hardware world in five years.

I'll repeat, Apple are worth jack shit in the PC space. I think everyone else has been a pretty credible competitor to apple for the past 20 or so years.

 

It actually has an innovative hardware solution

Dude needs to do research:

Asus-Eee-Keyboard.jpg

 

It's not the first, it won't be the last. It will suck for gaming though. Not like any gamer worth their salt will end up using a trackpad for gaming. It'll still end up with a mouse stuck in the side. (Oh and the support will probably suck, especially when it's on such an expensive product)

 

One set of hardware, one set of drivers,

Laptops already have that "advantage" and have for years. And the updates will most likely come through the component manufacturers or MS. I don't see Razer doing much with helping on the driver side.

 

 

*Also what is with the constant comparison to Apple macbooks? Mac only just got Steam support last year. It's games library is woefully small. If you want to compare it go with an Alienware.

 

Kotaku is a joke when it comes to PC coverage.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aaaand he took away my star! I literally laughed out loud when I saw he did that, I'm shocked I kept it as long as I did.

 

http://kotaku.com/58...194444#comments

 

He's laughably defensive about any comment that calls him a paid shill, making it all the more obvious.

 

One good read through the comments section has reminded me why I left in the first place. A bunch of garbage articles written by egotistical monkeys, for ignorant yes-man monkeys. I have no idea why we wanted this hack to associate himself with us.

Edited by RockyRan
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That smug dickbag..... I'm tempted to create a nick over there just to add to the numbers of people (who should be his adoring public, in his mind) that think that he's a piece of human garbage. His presence in video game journalism is a fluke, and he's the only person who doesn't seem to realize it. When 90% of your comments are critical, it must be because everyone is an idiot but you, right Joel?

 

What a deluded and insecure man.

 

Congrats on the star loss, less chance you'll get mistaken for an asskisser over at Kotaku. Seems like everyone there toting a star has shit on the corners of their mouths nowadays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the fact that he approached us at all gave us the idea that he was cut from a different cloth to the other writers, I know that's the opinion it gave me. I was looking at some of his other comments in that article and one stood out above the others: Link

 

I mean, really? The guy makes some good points and all he gets is that sort of reply from the writer? Talk about unprofessional.

 

Congrats on the star loss, less chance you'll get mistaken for an asskisser over at Kotaku. Seems like everyone there toting a star has shit on the corners of their mouths nowadays.

 

Which is one of the reasons I'm glad I lost it. It's not as if I was ever licking the ass of anyone over there, I've just been lucky. I do feel a tinge of sadness though. Now I can't promote those intelligent comments the asslickers ignore!

Edited by MasterDex
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thing is Joel talks of standardization, and that's what PC already has. Without becoming consoles you can't become much more standardized. You've got DirectX to make GPUs play happy, you've got drivers and APIs to make all the random parts play pretty with Windows. You've got USB so even your peripherals run through a standard port.

 

And yeah if you get a reaction like that from the editors you must have said something right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't get to accuse us of being paid to write what we want and be a starred commenter.

Wait, what? :scratch:

 

Is it the accusation of free will that upset him, or the implication that he has a salary?

 

Nah, he picked up what I was saying correctly. I was accusing him of being paid to write up a glowing review of the machine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the fact that he approached us at all gave us the idea that he was cut from a different cloth to the other writers, I know that's the opinion it gave me. I was looking at some of his other comments in that article and one stood out above the others: Link

 

Wow, that's really an irrelevant counter-argument attempted to gain merit and approval by being a witty humourous response <3 I was born in 1989 and while I did play games from the 16bit era, I was too young to know anything properly. I know about that period of gaming well enough because I actually spent 2 years later in my life playing those game exclusively. Age or whether you've been into something more than someone is irrelevant, or rather, that actual fact is irrelevant. It's what you did with that time. If he was confident enough in his own knowledge and article, he would have argued the finer points. I personally ignore rude comments directed at my work or respond to them equally rude. The person he was responding to was willing to offer backed-up arguments, at least show the same courtesy or just don't respond at all. :wub:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I realize why he'd unstar you for that, but I find it quite sad that he found it appropriate to tell you how you don't deserve a star.

 

Well, I didn't. Only asslickers deserve stars these days, at least that's how it comes across now. Anyway, enough about me. Let's get back to fucking Kotaku...I mean, complaining about fucking Kotaku.

Edited by MasterDex
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't get to accuse us of being paid to write what we want and be a starred commenter.

Wait, what? :scratch:

 

Is it the accusation of free will that upset him, or the implication that he has a salary?

 

Nah, he picked up what I was saying correctly. I was accusing him of being paid to write up a glowing review of the machine.

Oh I know he got the message, I just find it funny that someone who writes for a living can't even express himself properly. Out of the context of your comment, his reply makes no sense. 'Being paid to write what we want' is just one of the pros of being a 'professional' blogger, what he meant was 'being paid to write what other people want'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't get to accuse us of being paid to write what we want and be a starred commenter.

Wait, what? :scratch:

 

Is it the accusation of free will that upset him, or the implication that he has a salary?

 

Nah, he picked up what I was saying correctly. I was accusing him of being paid to write up a glowing review of the machine.

Oh I know he got the message, I just find it funny that someone who writes for a living can't even express himself properly. Out of the context of your comment, his reply makes no sense. 'Being paid to write what we want' is just one of the pros of being a 'professional' blogger, what he meant was 'being paid to write what other people want'.

 

Ahh, I see what you're getting at now. Yeah, all that rage over being called out must have confused him.

 

Loving the comments in this article. Now everyone is making comments about how it seems like paid coverage. Seems to be a strange lack of starred commenters making the same accusations though, I wonder why.

Edited by MasterDex
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...