Jump to content

Gawker's Latest Embarrassment


Bouchart
 Share

What is worse?  

37 members have voted

  1. 1. Which makes Gawker look worse?

    • Their user passwords were stolen
    • They use this to plug an article about creating strong passwords


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 267
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

You know, the community at the site has always been the only draw. It's a shame that they have such incompetent people at the helm. I think I may be done with Gawker completely after this though. Sure sounds like they did nothing to fix the problem according to Forbes.

 

http://blogs.forbes.com/firewall/2010/12/13/the-lessons-of-gawkers-security-mess/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From: http://gizmodo.com/comment/34011087

"Once again, we're here for you, the commenter. Our posts would be boring without comments, and it's pretty accurate to say that we have some of the best commenters anywhere on the internet. Seriously, you can go to any site, look at their comments, then come back here and realize that we have it pretty freakin' great. You guys make our stories pop, and in many instances, add and contribute new facts that we hadn't considered. You guys even started a thriving community based on just comments."

http://gizmodo.com/5687692/you-write-bias-journalism-and-i-read-derp

 

laugh.giflaugh.giflaugh.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jack, you're clean.

 

Strife, both password and email are compromised, so change your password.

 

Acula, I'm sorry but finding "Ixa" via notepad is worse than "drag". But it seems you already checked it, so all is well I guess?

 

 

Can you check HJSoulma? I'm trying to remember every single place I've ever bought something from, and it'd be nice to know whether I actually need to do that or not... *sigh*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My issue is I can't remember all the various places I've used this specific combo.Urg.
Same. I keep all of my passwords in a TXT file on an encrypted drive on two different PCs... except the unimportant ones. Apparently I considered Kotaku to be one of those sites. *L* I highly doubt I used the same password there with anything I actually care about, though.

 

I used to keep all of my passwords in a .txt file, but I recently wrote them all down on a sheet of paper. Hurray for physical media!

 

yea, I keep attempting to log in periodically, but if it comes to making a new profile and going through the hassle of getting approved, I'm done.

 

I could get your account approved on Kotaku. I have one of those yellow things! If you really wanted to go back to Kotaku, that is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still can't work out what the big deal is about the "peasants" comment. From what I understand it was seemingly a joke comment by one of the Gawker writers made in June on a private chat that has been badly reported to look like it was them saying that it doesn't matter that the commenter's passwords had been hacked, which it had nothing to do with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the Forbes blog (emphasis by me):

 

In perhaps a good example of don’t write it if you wouldn’t want someone to read it, this screenshot from the attackers showed up on thenextweb.com, detailing a conversation from July 22nd between internal Gawker employees noting that usernames and passwords for Gawker users had shown up on 4 chan. In the chat, Gawker’s Hamilton Nolan, after hearing that it is just Gawker users who have been compromised, remarks “oh, well. unimportant”. Gawker’s Richard Lawson wants to know if the breach is limited to “just the peasants?”

http://blogs.forbes.com/firewall/2010/12/13/the-lessons-of-gawkers-security-mess/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah that chat box is from an earlier leak. A sign back then that they should tighten security. Notice how no one was alerted back then.I stead Gawker just moved to provoking 4Chan more.

 

This is one of those odd cases where I'm taking the side of 4chan. Even though a little non-critical information of mine was temporarily compromised, I'm glad Gawker's arrogance is being punished.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just saying that it's bad reporting that has gotten people to think the "peasants" comment was a reaction to a huge loss of usernames and passwords that just happened, which it wasn't. Yes, overall it shows that the staff that run and manage the site are incompetent, and should have fixed this problem a while back, but people shouldn't be getting so upset at the writers about this comment, when their comment has little to do with the current issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...