Jump to content

Religion Thread


Thorgi Duke of Frisbee
 Share

Recommended Posts

I am not done watching it, but he uses the old I have a black friend argument so immediately have less respect for anything else he brings up. Anyways the guy was asking for it by titling the book "Zealot" and not just saying it was just a take on Jesus from a historical point of view and without religious prejudice. 

Edited by Dr.Krieger
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

The heat must of gotten to them. Poor souls.
Up next, God is pissed because He salted the fields. Its totally not because of the increasingly salt laden groundwater which does a shit job in low water usage irrigation.

 

God, can I get a vision of what that area of California must of been like before we drained it, subsided it and wrecked the native flora and fauna? The entirety of the Central Valley was something to behold a few hundred years ago. The southern part had lakes and wetlands. Can't imagine that now, can you? Call bullshit if anybody says they know and can imagine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you put it that way, then yeah, I get what you are saying. I know a few folks like that. I know a barber who talk crazy talk when it comes to geol-

The geologist is leaking. 

Oh... I wonder what will leak next. Wanna hear about the zircons I'm helping to collect?

 

Anyways, she is quite sane. Just a bit misinformed. For the folks at the church, it is rather hard to see aphids on a ground level plant, let alone a damn tree. Also DailyFail not even once.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Christianity: How America's Top 20 Churches Brand Their Message

 

A friend of mine linked this on Facebook, so I took a look and it's actually interesting. It's not so much about the entire message of these churches, but when you go to their website, what imagery and message you'll see in a first impression. Some you'll see have a focus on church leadership, others on donations, either to the church itself or as humanitarian aid. What stuck out to me is how few have pictures of Jesus Christ, though that could be dependent on how each church sees the portrayal of their Savior.

 

EDIT: This has a focus on Christian churches, so that would explain why you won't see other religions represented.

Edited by Atomsk88
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 months later...

I've a feeling that US coverage of him might be a bit different given I've seem some Americans online that seem to be under the impression that Catholic church is as anti-science as some fundamentalist christian types and shocked to find that catholic church over it's history is actually quite pro-science and funded many scientists and findings over the centuries (then again some are shocked to find Catholic church is a wing of Christianity). It's just a bit awkward slow moving in reconciling modern science with catholic dogma, in olden days it's a bit easier to have the time to figure how Darwins findings work within your framework compared to the speed required to make choices on how your rules tie in with safe sex and AIDs.

 

Francis in general has a somewhat down-to-earth and humble portrayal over the older bullet proof pope-mobile driving predecessor. Yeah still under the "homosexuality is a sin" that other denominations have, but at least he's joining some of the modern ones with the "well, homorelationships are okay I guess, just don't do the sex part" which is a reasonable half-way and is something Catholic church needed to cover with same-sex marriages quickly spreading throughout the world.

 

Compared to past popes he seems a decent sort, but being tied to catholic and christian doctrine he is going to be inflexible in some points just like predecessors. Probably going to still shit in the woods.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meant by whom?  That's a completely arbitrary statement.  Religion is a social construct, and like any social construct it changes over time.  Even if you believe the writings themselves were handed down word for word by God, they're still being interpreted by fallible humans, and as such are subject to reinterpretation.  If the writings weren't meant to be reinterpreted then being a biblical scholar wouldn't even be a thing that exists.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
  • 1 year later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...