You implied as much saying that the pieces were to be made 'ornately'. Your chess pieces could be rough hewn chunks of rock, doesn't matter to the merit of the work you went on to describe. Just correcting that art doesn't have to look pretty, and something that is pretty isn't art.
I know it's an art installation, didn't realise I had to point out it wasn't a government installation or whatever
And in your example the artist didn't make the chess set. In programming the programmer is making the beet bottle though. You can't just get 3D modellers. No programming, no engine, no game mechanics, no game.
One day that programming language may exist, but for now it's a pretty long way off. But in the here and now it is still limited to only a handful of people. It's hardly the greatest form of expression if you can't actually use it.
A book with grammar badly, art not be, compile he said not? As for incorrect spelling, you seemed to figure out I meant installation easy enough. It would be bad, but it wouldn't mean it won't "compile" in peoples heads. And whose to say you made a film with low exposure on purpose. I didn't at all say that people would be instantly highly skilled at it, just that should anyone strike upon the fancy, there is zero entry level involved. They might be naturally skilled, they probably won't. But with game creation you need to be highly skilled to even be bad at it. If you're not skilled you can't be anything at it.
To get good at say..painting, you can experiment, you can practice, you can get formal training, look at and be inspired by other works. Can't really do anything but the formal training with games. Can't just open up Eclipse, jam in some random words and *poof* minecraft.
Just as a quick example but out drawing thread is going relatively strong, we've got a bunch of short stories in literary creativity, I think we've even got a photo thread somewhere. But the make a games thread is stuck at the "we have an idea". There's very little way for the regular Joe to make a VG idea become realisation.
Also how come on one hand 'art can be good and bad', but on the other 'oh well if you're not trained it'll suck and won't be art"?
@hot heart: Punk would disagree with you. And very loudly too