Waldorf and Statler

Pretty but shallow? MOAR LIKE EVERY WOMAN I'VE MET AMIRITE GAIS?

And just imagine, having your own dog is much better.

Who voted for xbox o- oh. It's all good. No need to judge. .... KILL DA CHEWIE KILL DA CHEWIE

I just realized the Paywall and F2P don't go hand in hand for the most part.

I didn't get it at first. Then I saw the interview. And Jesus Christ. I didn't realize Nickelodeon hired Disney rejects.

All I know is this about Final Fantasy. I disliked the combat, setting and characters of FFXIII. Not to mention the whole no city hubs shit. This game already looks like it has a combat I'll enjoy more, a setting more aching to anime which I love, and characters that dont look like they belong in a cosplaying catalogue [outside of the main guy's hair].

You're the one that's awful.

I can't wait for KH3, but I want this one to be the probably better experience.

If so then we have to consider both Blizzard and console's rules there.

Has nobody posted the FFXV gameplay video? The one with sweet Asian Wolfpack co-op?

I'm flabbergasted [high vocab points] by the amount of people with devil advocate syndrome somehow inventing ways publishers will be able to force DRM on the PS4 so they feel better about choosing the Juan. It really is the most creative bullshit I've seen. And the easiest answer as to why it won't happen is "look at every game today". When Diablo 3 is mentioned they fail to recognize that had a huge scandal behind its choice. I'm not even sure if Blizzard said that single player on consoles has to be online.

I'm actually glad it's not. Six-axis and cameras and other stuff is gimmicky for me. It's like Iris. Oh look how cool I can talk to my iphone. Wait this is silly, I can do things faster by typing it out myself.

http://www.gamefront.com/sony-third-party-drm-refers-to-playing-used-games-online-only/ Sony just clarified for the better. If you don't want to clink the link basically what it says is that it's the same as the PS3's for online gaming. They will strictly enforce that playing single player/offline won't have DRM but that publishers have the option to enforce used game multiplayer/online stuff.

Clarification is nice, especially after the small outcry over PS+ yesterday. But like others have said if you have a PS and don't have PS+ you're doing it wrong.

Yeah Xbox Fanboys are gonna use that DRM news as ammo but the reality is quite different. Microsoft has their own DRM in place in their console with the no trading and online connectivity issue. Sony has no forced online. That means that third party developers, unless the game is strictly multiplayer, can't FORCE you to have some form of internet-DRM to play the singleplayer. Imagine the shitstorm if you pop in a game in a console where offline is an option and it tells you "To play this game you need to log in and input your key". That works with multiplayer games. EA already dropped online passes so I think they're betting their chickens on the Xbox One bringing in enough new game revenue to account for 'losses' the PS4 will bring. But if the PS4 does end up selling more or about the same they can't just drop support. Ubisoft shouldn't have an issue as they haven't dropped their online pass system, and Activision never truly got past it and might just keep up the season pass system which makes them bucketloads. What I'm saying I guess is the same as Cowboy. This is no different than what is currently in store with PS3 and 360. EA/Ubisoft/Activision know the console isn't forced to use online so they can't force full-game DRM. Indie developers are getting a boost in the PS4. And w/ Sony allowing first party titles to be used as people want, if these publishers decided to not allow trading of used games when other publishers and Sony allow it they'd get SO much negative attention. Sony handed them a loaded revolver and everybody else on the table passed on trying to shoot themselves. The publisher can choose to take the risk and fuck over consumers and get their brains blown or not participate as well and make slightly less money. I can't think of a single publisher that would willingly fuck themselves over so basically I can assure it's no DRM and being able to trade games for the most part.

lol at the ending. "Why hello there Watson. Seems you'll never get rid of meeee"

^yeah. I'm waiting for 2014, besides my birthday, because Destiny and Infamous aren't slated till early 2014.

the problem with that, as with the juan, is the gimmick peripheral. in this case the Nintentablet

I'm definitely getting the PS4. But as an unemployed college student I can't afford 400 by myself. I'll probably ask my folks to help me w/ $200 for my birthday early january and I'll put in the rest.

I'm a sucker for anything with RPG in it and it actually means it. So color me curious.

I loved the chatbox on gametrailers when Sony was talking about tv, music, movies and social stuff. People were all "lol MS got done with this already, Sony fails!" and similar comments. Really people? Microsoft spends a whole conference on that and they're in the clear, while Sony spends 20 mins and they are evil incarnate?

MS would charge you to gloriously look at their console if they could.

I'm too giddy from the absolute trolling against Microsoft to care right now imho. Tomorrow once I calm down I'll think more rationally.