Reading you guys' arguments, it almost seems like it arises from a pretty dumb thing. I'm not calling any one of you guys ideals and beliefs wrong or right but...
There is no way to present a standard of living data without skewing it to any one side of a linear plot or even a non-linear plot. People lives can be and are vastly different so its terrible to present it as high or low, which is linear in nature. However, its the easiest way to present data since it is simple to understand. High and low? Easy but skewed. So it make it non-skewed, context should be provided. It is up to the provider of the data to give context or for the viewers to seek it out if not provided. Going with Yant's examples:
We got context of whatever standard of living data we have. With this context, I can pretty much pull out City A from my analysis. I should also make a note of why I did as well which would be: City A is wealthy enough and well off that I can ignore them. City B on the other hand is on the other side of the spectrum. It seems pretty damn good but its poor as hell. Since it is poor as hell, I should take a closer look at this city.
So yeah. CONTEXT, CONTEXT, CONTEXT, CONTEXT, CONTEXT. What you got, where you got it and how you got it. Data without context is useless data.
Now you guys can now continue at going at each other. How I fit in the current debate... having options is great. Rarely does life not give you options. If not provided with some, make some. Society is just that, a society. Its just not me and my family. So I'll help out society but don't expect me to bend the knee. Don't overreach and overstay. I'll help other people stand but they got to do their own walking. If they are just pleased with just standing, fine by me. They just got to remember to not come to me if they want to walk.