Surely if Metro was a compelling interface and environment then users and developers would naturally gravitate towards it rather than being needed to be force fed it?
I don't get my own point? lolwut. I know exactly what I was saying, you're the one that struggled to grasp the point I was making. You've struggled to grasp the point even when directly comparing Windows 8 to other desktop OSes. The method of powering off an Android phone is the same method as used in phones from way back when. Windows 8 is a massive change from the powering down the computer from the way desktop OSes have worked across platforms and time. Focusing on the button of a phone is what is missing the point.
99% of laptops are interfaced with via a kb/m, same as desktops, touchscreen laptops and desktops are still exceedingly rare (though yes likely to be pushed more now). I have continually focused on the use of kb/m within Windows 8. Just becuase I don't mention netbooks/laptops/notebooks/portables/whatever by name doesn't mean I'm ignoring them, I'm just saving on typing it out every time to sate your silly needs.
The reason I didn't take in their phone and tablet sales is because we're discussing a computer operating system, not a phone one. And even taking into account their tablets they still have jack shit of the computer market. If you're wanting to take into account all the OSes on the planet it becomes a whole different ballgame. So yeah the focus is on computer operating systems, especially on talking about enterprise as we were at the time.
Proof on threat of the Windows desktop being phased out? Easy, MS-DOS. They came out with Windows and it's new GUI interface and had MS-DOS as something you could go back to within Windows should you still need legacy programs like WordPerfect and Lotus 123. And slowly but surely it was phased out to the point it no longer runs without using a VM/emulator. You honestly don't think this won't happen with Windows in future?