Saturnine Tenshi

You can find it subbed in English.

Fixed!

Finally finished Borderlands 2. Pretty mediocre game, but I tend to get more out of coop than a lot of people would. Moved on to the Tiny Tina DLC.

So it's less of an issue of Obamacare having a large effect on the debt ceiling than it is political agendas?

Nier. Nier. Nier.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7HkG6OSo3E&feature=youtu.be

Welcome to the forums, Sigma. I don't do much posting (mostly stick to reading what these doofuses post), but I'll see you around.

I feel like I'm missing something in the grand scheme of things. Going to sum up what I've gathered from the situation (which could very well be wrong). 1. Debt ceiling needs to be increased. 2. Obamacare is part of this. 3. Republicans don't like that, say negative to Obamacare. 4. Obama says he'd veto. 5. Republicans freeze gov't. If that's the case, exactly how much of an impact would Obamacare be making on the US debt?

You must have some insider info, Dean. Let me in on it.

Sounds like some other company that got into consoles two generations ago.

I didn't mean it as an insult. That's just what the gameplay video looks like. Edit: Though I guess finding distinctive parallels between the gameplay of any game and Borderlands is an insult. : \ Sorry!

I hate you, Amazon.com and Canadian customs.

Is this basically a better-looking Borderlands type game?

That doesn't prevent them from making manufacturing deals with companies or taking a loss and making up for it later (or not). And as far as PC gaming is concerned, I think they've just as much clout as Sony or Nintendo.

What makes you think the parts will cost as much as it would for an average Joe?

God will surely damn you . . . You're already dead.

I complain pretty regularly about no standard e-book format. It's a real pain in the ass. And different readers handle the same format differently, too. Epub through B&N is definitely the worst I've come across. I haven't bothered with whatever bullshit iBookstore is using, mind you. They want me to use Apple software.

It's an extender. The WRN2000RPT. Maybe it is just a router, but it says extender on the box! My router is in the basement and I need connectivity upstairs.

Making PVC bows. :V

RO2 was actually a great friggin' game, but I didn't have anyone to do MP with. And that's really what makes MP fun.

Bought a wireless extender recently actually. Also bought a quiver, finger guard, some beeswax, 10' of PVC pipe, polypropylene twine, and a half-round file.

I was hoping the digital price dropped as well, but it's still $36. :<

I guess I've just had bad (or good?) work environments. Regardless, I don't think it should be a big part of a character's story unless it's integral to the character. Overt, maybe, but not defining. That isn't helping to build better characters or working in favor of the LGBT community.

Someone has to give the dakimakura some lovin'. I'm doing them a service. I'll concede the gf/bf point, and even attractiveness in others to some extent. I just don't get those as recurring or regular conversation topics. Excepting those obnoxious folk who go on about their S.O. relentlessly. Casual mention of a S.O. (or even an entire conversation) is one thing, but centering the narrative camera on that one aspect of a person is another. Like, I understand if that's a core character motivator or it's integral to their story. But generally it shouldn't make the character. "He's gay. That's the character." There's a difference between revealing and shouting. But maybe the case is that I don't get out often enough. In which case I'm glad I'm missing all these people going on and on about their significant others and ass-titties-dick-eyes-smile talk.

Isn't it best to write minorities the same way you'd write a, God I'm going to say it, cisgendered heterosexual male? If you're writing them specifically as a trans actress or gay cabby, you're just reinforcing the idea of "the other". As far as forcing it goes, I guess it is forced if you're just shoving them in there for no other reason to have minorities present for the sake of representation. Which is only slightly less silly than not including them because they're minorities as far as I'm concerned. But that still doesn't mean you have to write them as a stereotypical gay gal. I don't see why it needs to be pointed out that a gay person is gay to begin with if they aren't in a situation or conversation that calls for it. Do people run around shouting their sexual orientation nowadays? I don't get out too often.