madbassman39

I saw a video a while back and it had lock on combat, and for some strange reason that turned me off. It does look pretty sweet though.

When I first heard they were doing this I knew very little of Guardians of the Galaxy except for Drax and Star Lord. I seriously thought it was a bad idea to expand the Marvel CU beyond Earth, because it probably wouldn't sit well. The more I heard about it the more I was getting interested in it. Now, I want this movie to be so good. I want this to be our next Sci-Fi epic, hopefully (though doubtfully) one that can bring the feeling I felt the first time I saw Star Wars. Whether its going to shake the foundation of science fiction or not, I'm looking forward to this movie. It looks fun and thats what these Marvel movies are all about.

I don't know much about their store :/ I tend to buy origin codes from other sites for games that require Origin.

I always feel guilty for liking Origin's layout and quickness more than Steam. I don't use Origin like I use Steam, but when I do I am always impressed by their overlay, usability and just the overall design.

My birthday is May 21, and seeing those billboards made me wish the world had ended. I felt that if it did, that would make me some kind of divine entity. Anyhow, I was hoping (although I knew it wouldn't happen) that Nintendo would announce they would bring their games multiplatform. If I could play Zelda, Mario, Kirby, Metroid, or any other Nintendo game from their back catalog that I've never played on my PS3 via the PSN I would be so happy.

Not only does your article explicitly say that Toad cannot be from the future, but we also know that the Empire covers are misleadin. for example Rogue is a cover, but she has been cut from the film entirely. From your linked article As Dean said, there is nothing here saying it is not Toad from X1.

I gave the controller to my girlfriend and told her I bought the game for her. I enjoyed watching her play it and she loved it. I can't wait for Episode 2! (Wolf Among Us)

I didn't have your linked article before I had mentioned that it may be future Toad, all I saw was the previously linked Imgur covers. So your "I shouldn't have to explain why" comment was un justified. Your only argument is an article which says "Toad (Past)". You provide no argument aside from that single line as to why Toad couldn't exist in the future. I figured that the background image, although shows its the past, could include future Toad since time travel is the plot of the film. I was speculating, and really didn't need your arrogant remarks.

I don't recall any of the movies explicitly saying Toad had died. He was struck by lightning and send screaming off into the ocean. Not one other part of any of the other movies said he was dead. Toad didn't return in 2 or 3, but that doesn't mean he didn't live. We've seen almost every X-men survive blows that should knock and or kill a person, Cyclops blasted Sabertooth, so suspension of disbelief tells me that there is a possibility that Toad survived. So now, tell me how it is obvious that Toad isn't in the future?

Thanks for the link, but I had not read the comic nor did I know that Toad doesn't exist in the future. I guess I shouldn't be commenting on this thread if I haven't read all of the X-men comics.

You're telling me that because of the background Toad is from the past? In a movie with some Time Travel elements? It looks like he has some Lightning scars, but thanks for the sarcastic, and somewhat asshole-y response.

My biggest issue with Toad is that he looks very different from the original X-men version, but I assume that is future Toad, which is Okay by my standards. I always treated First Class as a reboot without actually rebooting the franchise, and my understanding is that this movie is going to be their reset button, retconning everything from X3 and Wolverine Origins.

Once I read that they were being accused of using ACII code in the game, I couldn't help noticing that a lot of the animations look way too familiar. Anyhow, it seems like a shame to use Assassins Creed as your model to make a LotR game, although they tried Action RPG's and haven't done so well... It looks good and entertaining, and as a fan of AC I may try it out, but I'm going to wait a while after release to try it.

Blink doesn't look TOO bad, although Quicksilver looks atrocious. Personally I enjoyed the look of Beast in First Class, thought it was a good departure and similar to the newer look of Beast (Secret Avenger Beast). Also, why is Professor X standing?

This plus the return of the Start button makes 8.1 look and feel less new for people and allow people to transition to the new computer layout. Honestly, I didn't mind windows 8, but I also understood why people didn't like it. I think this looks and feels a lot less disjointed too. I really wanted windows 8 to be something great, I remember using DOS, but I have no memory of how important the transition from DOS to Windows was. I had hoped Win. 8 would have been that next big step in UI.

It looks like they are adding the buttons. http://www.joystiq.com/2014/01/15/steam-controller-ditches-touch-screen-for-traditional-buttons/ I like this design much more, but I am disappointed because IF the steam controller was a better way to control, as much as I would've resisted the change, I would've appreciated what they were doing.

Double post sorry

I probably won't switch over, or at least will take a very long time to switch over. I like the traditional controller layout, and the 360 near perfected it and now the PS4 controller feels even better. If games begin to only support the steam controller, I probably won't get one. Damn Computer...

ah shop keeps I understand. Although I've been lucky to not have those guys not die yet.

NO NO NO! The beauty of Skyrim is your followers dying and actually being sad about it! I lost Lydia in my most recent play through while exploring a cave. I was sad, because that means she had to have burned to death!

Anchorman 2. I don't know, it was between OK and Good to me. It was longer than it should've been, the plot was well developed but the humor was more random than the first one. The only reason I put it here instead of OK is because of how much I laughed. I laughed so much at the film. Its funny, but its not as good as the first.

Got Assassins Creed 4 for Xmas, started to play it two days ago. My goodness its fantastic, only because its a really fun Pirate game. I like the Assassin's Creed stuff being Sprinkled in so far, but I'm just enjoying hunting for treasures and taking down ships to get material to upgrade my Jackdaw.

I saw Hunger Games: Catching Fire. My girlfriend was a huge fan of the books, told me to read the first one, bought it for me with my kindle so I read it. The book was great, the film, not so much. I didn't read the second book, but I watched the movie with her. Boy, this was just so much better in every way. The characters were better, the plot development mattered, and as far as I knew they didn't ruin a character defining moment like they did in the first movie. I wasn't interested in seeing the movie going in, but I'm ready to watch the third film now.