That's actually a good point that I hadn't considered: when publishers/devs talk about how many people pirated their game, I doubt they're taking into account how many of those people are in territories where it's just not feasible to acquire it legally.
Actually I knew about that page, but there's no demo link on it, so I wasn't sure if it was just cause the demo wasn't up or because that was only the "info" page and not actually a download page.
I don't know if it's accurate, but the first comment on the RPS article (which I'd actually checked after I commented, but before you did ) says 9 AM PST, which is in about 2 hours.
So I just read the EULA, and here's where I imagine they get you:
Section 4(E) of the Subscriber Agreement says
"Subscriptions" are game purchases. I bet the Russian sites aren't authorized resellers. They also reserve the right to cancel you Subscriptions (remove games from your account) whenever they want, without a refund, but I'd like to see them try to enforce that in court without a good reason for doing so (like you bought an unauthorized copy, or something).
Even in the US, just cause it's in the EULA doesn't mean that it's actually enforceable.
I will be sure to carefully read the EULA first though if I ever decide to buy a game from those Russian sites, since I don't want to have to go to court over it even if I could win.
As I tweeted earlier, my theory is that EA's plan to bring down Call of Duty doesn't involve actually making a game that sells better, it's just to so completely saturate the modern shooter market that no one wants to buy any game like that, Call of Duty included.
In our history classes it's basically we talk about Europe from the ancient Greeks up through the American Revolution, and then it's like Europe stops existing except in as much as they're dealing with the US.
And here's my attempt at Europe:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/9518980/European%20Map.png
So were people who got their accounts deactivated because of the MW2 thing able to do anything about it? Cause if not that sounds like class action lawsuit to me.
That's a separate issue, though. That's Valve treating it as if $ = €, which they've done for a while too.
I was actually planning on recording "roof", "hoof", "too", "took" and "tuck" when I get home this afternoon. Because here "too", "took", and "tuck" are 3 distinct sounds, but it sounds like to you "took" and "tuck" sound the same.
I thought they were coming from making the combat more action-y.
Well, hearing that the combat may have retained the tactical-ness bumped my interest up from "almost certainly not buying" down to "probably not buying". This news about the NPC armor has knocked it back down to "almost certainly not buying."