Gyaruson

My guess is because he is inside a Gamestop.

Seriously? It's the "dungeon" where you meet the Yeti and his wife, and you have to gather ingredients to make soup, or something. And it had those fucking horrible icewolves that would respawn every time you left the area and came back.

The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess (specifically, the home of that ice Yeti creature)

The mouth doesn't look right for it to be Earl. But, you're probably right...

GTA London are mission packs for the original GTA. They require GTA1 in order to play. So, they are not sequels.

I had fun with RDR for all the reasons why I had fun with GTA3 - just screwing around. The story of RDR was shit, but that's what people praise it for. I was stoked to play RDR, but was let down hour after hour. I even 100% the game, and it was miserable. You can't honestly say that I'm not trying. I mean, seriously. It's subjective, mang.

Pokemon Snap!

Carmageddon

YES! I are the winrars!

Thief Deadly Shadows

Man, that little thing in the corner is really throwing me off. It looks o familiar, yet I can't place it.

NiGHTS

Oh, well alright then. On to the next one!

Damn! I was gonna guess Four Swords, but I didn't know if replying to my erroneous post would be counted as a guess. DAMN IT ALL!

I mean Link's Awakening DX. Mah bad.

The Legend of Zelda: Links Awakening

I think you are interpreting "different" as "good". Half-Life was a new (and much needed) step for FPS's, but it wasn't very good. At least it was better than Half-Life 2 though. The same can be said for Heavy Rain and Red Dead Redemption. They were both bad games that need to exist in order to advance the medium.

Star Wars Jedi Academy?

Sid Meier's Civilization (insert number).

Correct. Your move.

Oh, I forgot one: - The Half-Life series

I expected nothing and was still disappointed. It's not so much the farting, or the fact that it doesn't take itself seriously that bothers me, I think. What bothers me, is that Molyneux tries to act like Fable games are these epic adventures full of amazing moments of heroism and questing. When, it's not. At all. It's just a dude running around. There are no big battles (not even when you're king does that fight seem massive - it always felt isolated to wherever your player was at the time), no life changing decisions. I mean, I only saved about 2 million of my citizens and still didn't notice much difference, except that nobody ever came to collect the dead; and that was just annoying. I dunno, you just can't sell me shit under the guise that it's steak and expect me to be happy that it's pretty good for being shit.

Fine, I'll say. Bazooka Blitzkrieg. Also known as Destruction in Japan. On we go.

Lawls.

Nobody talks about its faults, they talk about how Molyneux is up his own ass. No one ever talks about the shitty (nonexistent) conversation system, the monotonous button mashing combat, the retardedly obvious morality choices or the fact that the game doesn't even take itself seriously. All anyone ever complains about is that Goddamn tree that doesn't actually grow over time, and the fact that there is always some non-important piece left out of the final product because Molyneux doesn't deliver. - http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox/fable - http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360/fable-ii - http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360/fable-iii All three above 80%. That's overrated.