I'm cool with the community (though lately not so much. With great size comes lots of crap. Also they seem to have got rid of the mods they had over summer)
The writers not so much. Totilo is great. He could do better elsewhere though. Owens fine too, though sometimes maybe adds a touch of unnecessary political commentary to some posts and he unfortunately (though good for him I guess) is covering one of the least liked genres in gaming (though if he eyed up football more often and the PC, well Football Manager 2010/2011 were the best selling PC games in the UK last year. But he doesn't really touch much up on those)
Ashcraft could be a cool guy, but he's a shite games journalist. I think him being in Japan is about the only reason he's on. And he rarely takes advantage of it (you could be outside of japan and still follow 2chan, Japanese news n TV etc) Luke covers more gamin stuff, but as others has noticed tends to be a bit more inflammatory than the others. McWhertor is meh. He slides from good to bad like a yo-yo these days. (.e.g last nights 'arizona shooter was a gamer'). Fahey can post some pretty good stuff. He lost quite a bit of respect from me over his OTT iPad coverage. But I dunno if that was jsut his excitement, or some higher ups wanting some cross-posting opportunities with Gizmodo.
However none of them quite reach the soaring heights of Crecente. The dude running the show who lets all this go on below him. None of these guys technically able to post what they do without his go ahead. He's currently got an article on the Verizon iPhone. None of that matters to gaming in anyway shape or form unless Verizon are also coming out with a selection of Verizon exclusive games. But they're not so. Meh.
If they changed from Kotaku: The Gamers Guide to Kotaku: Random Shit, then I wouldn't have much issue, but they tout themselves as a games site, then post a crap ton of inane drivel with sometimes the weakest connection to gaming. What sucks is there's so much game news out there that they shouldn't even have to resort to that. I think it's a Gawker thing though. Gizmodo is very much the same. you can compare Gizmodo to Engadget, n Gizmodo will have some thing about Australian floods, and Engadget will have a tear down of a tablet.
So yeah these days I'll have a glance at the stories, certainly don't read it like I used to, mostly sticking to TAY n #speakup, where the community hangs out. Then I get most of my actual news from my RSS feeds.