TheMightyEthan

Bungie...

What's wrong with your joycons?

Hellblade: Senua's Sacrifice and Moonlighter from the Humble Monthly. I really got it for Hellblade, because the $12 subscription cost is tied for the cheapest Hellblade has ever been.

I've never heard any explanation that makes any kind of sense other than simple vindictiveness.

Tiny Metal: Act V They added another act to Tiny Metal some time ago, and I never got around to playing it. It was added for free, which is fantastic, I would have been quite happy with it as a paid expansion. It's more of the same from the main game, so if you liked that you'll like this, but it doesn't really add anything new either (other than new missions, obviously).

Yeah, I don't get why game companies are such assholes about who they credit. This is a pretty ridiculous example, but it's far from limited to XSEED.

That's weird as shit... I agree with you though, it seems like the most obvious application is haptic feedback.

That's like how our president keeps saying that when we impose tariffs on imports it's the other countries who pay them...

It's cool that you'll be able to migrate your bnet purchases and characters and everything over to Steam, but I really don't see myself going back to it... @Atomsk88 I played Destiny 2 on PC with a controller and was always competitive with the other players (in PvE, I don't play PvP so I can't comment on that), so you don't need to use kb/mouse if you don't want.

I love the grass monkey.

Steam gave me a 50% off coupon for Frostpunk since I own Banished, and apparently more than a year after it came out that's still the biggest discount it's ever had, so I went for it.

Observation It's basically 2001: A Space Odyssey where you're HAL, and it's fantastic. To go into basically any detail would be spoilers, but it's great and everyone should play it.

Surviving Mars: Green Planet I "beat" this game to the extent that you can beat a game like this. I did like that the Green Planet expansion gave you a larger overarching goal of completely terraforming Mars, but there wasn't really much to it when I finished, so it still just like of petered out like these games tend to. I had fun though, and that's what counts!

Yeah, I had kind of skipped through the video the first time (I was at work), and missed the part about the shields not turning red, but once I saw it I remembered that from Anniversary, and how weird it was. That was the only issue mentioned that I actually noticed on my own though.

That's kind of lame, but also I played the shit out of Halo 1 on OG Xbox and never noticed the difference, so meh.

I watched my wife play the first hour or so yesterday, and I didn't feel like I was missing anything, even though she kept noticing references to the first game, so it seems well-handled.

Ni No Kuni II: Revenant Kingdom. My wife loved the first one, and I've never gotten around to playing it, but apparently this is fairly standalone so I thought I could start here, and she'll have a good sequel to play.

That's certainly interesting. One of those things I could see going either way, either super useful or ending up just as a weird gimmick. At first I thought the whole bottom portion was a screen, keyboard included, which I could definitely see that being useful in some situations.

If it had been a racing game I would have still been disappointed, but also intrigued.

Discovery is exclusive to CBS All Access, Picard is on Amazon... it's like they don't want me to watch Star Trek... ?

I'm sick of the power flicking off for 1/4 second and killing my game, so I got a ups.

Observation, the second game I've actually paid for on the Epic Store. Been described as 2001: A Space Odyssey where you're HAL.

You might as well, it's probably better than the integrated graphics, so if you have it laying around no reason not to.

CoD: Infinite Warfare It was a lot of fun, and I liked the ship/mission selection aspect, but goddamn was the story bad. And not bad like incomprehensible, or simple, or whatever, but bad like the moral of the story is that you have to order your people into suicide missions in order to be an effective commander. According to this game there are two kinds of commanders: bad commanders who sacrifice the mission objectives to ensure that all of their people survive, and good commanders who do not care at all if their people survive as long as the objective is completed. I'm not sure if it was intentional or not, but the leader of the enemies actually represents the quintessential good commander by this game's view. Which brings me to my second major complaint. The enemies are cartoon villains who seek destruction for its own sake, with no regard for their own survival or the survival of those under their command, and without even the benefit of actual historical context to justify why they hate you so much. Like they're basically the villains from Modern Warfare with all the nuance shaved off. Which I feel like is saying something in and of itself: that the villains were paper-thin by the standards of Call of Duty. It was a lot of fun though. Also I liked the robot squad mate.

What program are you using to draw?